LOADING

Chaucers epic poem, Troilus and Criseyde, is not a new tale, but one Chaucer
merely expanded upon. One of these expansions that Chaucers work has become
renowned for is the improvement of the characters. Generally, Chaucers
characters have more texture, depth, humanity, and subtlety than those of the
previous tales. Of the three main figures in the epic poem, Troilus, Criseyde,
and Pandarus, Pandarus is the character that Chaucer took the most liberty with,
creating and evolving Pandarus until he had taken on an entirely different role.

However, this is not to say that Chaucer did not add his own style to Troilus
and Criseyde. Chaucers continual development of the primary characters
definitely lend more interest and humor to the epic poem, Troilus and Criseyde.

The most interesting character by far is Pandarus. He serves as the protagonist
and go between for Troilus and Criseyde. In fact, one could argue if it were not
for him, Troilus may never have attained the brief affections of his lady love,
Criseyde. When Pandarus comes across an uneasy Troilus and inquires as to the
cause of his trouble, his speech is very eloquent. It is this speech that gives
the reader his first glimpse of how subtlety and indirectness will initially
characterize Pandarus. Further along the passage, Pandarus torments Troilus into
anger, causing him to reveal the source of his woe. (Chaucer 24-5). In regard to
the introduction of Pandarus, Kirby concludes: “Chaucer makes us feel
that here is a witty, likable chap who does not take life too seriously and who
does not hesitate to mingle friendly works with good-natured taunts.” (127)
Pandarus also reveals that he is fairly well educated with his allusion to Niobe.

In addition to the revelation of his education, this also reveals Pandarus
penchant for a pattern of persuasion which he employs throughout his role.

“Pandarus thinks the that way to make a man do something that he does not
want to do is not to tell him bluntly and baldly what course of action he should
pursue, but rather, gradually to lead up to the main point, expanding on the
notion in various ways and especially by quoting sufficient authority and
testimony to show his plan is the correct one, in fact, the only one
possible” (Kirby 133). This demonstrates that not only does Pandarus have a
classical education, but that he also maintains some grasp on the concept of
psychology. Aside from the intellectual side of Pandarus, Chaucer develops a
very human aspect to this character. Chaucer purposefully places Pandarus in the
role of the unrequited lover, making him seem less feeble-minded. At the same
time however, Pandarus reasserts his illogical reasoning in order to convince
Troilus to divulge his heart wrenching secret. Even after Troilus curt
dismissal, Pandarus continues to badger the beleaguered knight, demonstrating
yet another strong personality characteristic: tenacity. This is supported by
Pandarus physically shaking Troilus. “And with that word he gan hym for to
shake,/And seyde, “Thef/ thow shalt hyre name telle,/But tho gan sely
Troilus for to quake/As though men sholde han led hym into helle,”(Chaucer
36). Consequentially frightened, Troilus tells Pandarus of his love for
Criseyde, Pandarus niece and even goes so far as to agree to enlist
Pandarus help in bringing his nieces heart to the beleaguered knight. In
his dealings with his niece, issues of Pandarus morality comes into being,
especially as his roll of the go-between for Troilus and Criseyde. “The
word pander, where he has bequeathed the English language, illuminates the
negative connotations that are put on his actions in modern meaning”
(Berkley Research 3). In regard to Pandarus selling of Criseydes honor,
one scholar believes that his loose morals would be fitting for someone of
younger years, but on an older man, it would be a serious affront to his
morality (Rosetti 177). A slightly more favorable view holds that as Pandarus is
beholden to aide a friend, Chaucer uses the characters charm to influence
readers to view the act as less of crime. Finally, one can take the opinion that
Pandarus actions coincide perfectly with the ideas of Courtly love and
therefore are less odious (Kirby 181). However grim these opinions maybe,
Chaucer, and as a result, Pandarus, takes the bull by the figurative horns and
addresses the issue. Criseyde questions Pandarus after his declaration of
Troilus love by saying: “Alas, for wo! Why nere I deed?/For of the
world the feyth is al agoon./Allas! what sholden straunge to me doon,/When he,
that for my beste frend I wende,/Ret me to love, and sholde it me defende?”
(Chaucer 61). Pandarus presents his position on the basis that he is aiding a
friend. But with Troilus, Pandarus argues the exact opposite. He claims he is
suffering from pangs of guilt. He states that he has behaved like a pimp through
true friendship and Troilus exonerates him (Chaucer 125-6). “Thus it seems
that Pandarus moral conflict is found not only among scholars, but in the
characters themselves. Both Criseyde and Pandarus realize that he is not
fulfilling his duty as an older relative” and that by pleading the case for
Troilus, Pandarus is dishonoring Criseyde (Berkeley Research 5). After coaxing
Criseyde to pass the night at his house and after hiding Troilus in a cramped
closet, Pandarus actions reveal his true busy-body qualities. He is always
present during the conversations of the lover and often stays past the time to
leave by unobtrusively claiming to read books. It would appear that his
curiosity goes beyond his desire to aide, marking him as a voyarist. However,
after the momentous night when Criseyde takes Troilus to be her lover,
Pandarus role diminished until the time of Criseydes betrayal is made
known. In his indecision over what to do during the awkward revelation of
Criseydes betrayal, Kirby argues that “This powerful scene, depicting
the great comic figure at a moment of high tragedy, showing his complete
helplessness, his utter inability to do anything further to help his friend and
yet, with it all, his great generousity and mercy, Is the last in which Pandarus
appears” (Kirby 176). This depicts the final development of the character
Pandarus. He has come full circle from the amicable, helpful friend, to the
original pimp, to the very soul of generosity. It is in the complexity of his
character for fully demonstrating true human beings rather than the age-old
stereotypes that the true genius of Chaucer is fully realized. Unlike the
imaginative character of Pandarus, Troilus follows fairly closely with the
previous sources. He is the epitome of the courtly lover. Paul Baum states that
“Troilus has but one religion, that of Love. He is neither pagan nor
Christian, but always a devout follower of amour courtois, an embodiment of the
best elements of the code. He has not thought, commits no act, which is not in
perfect harmony with the tenets of his religion” (152). The tenets of
courtly love are outlined by C. S. Lewis. They hold that the lover will always
choose to serve the lady he loves, requesting that he would be the only one she
allow to serve her. Secondly, he must be faithful to his lady and vice versa
once the lady of his heart accepts the lovestruck knight. Furthermore, the
knight will continually worship the lady and accomplish whatever tasks he deems
will make himself worthy of her. Lastly, and most importantly, courtly love
involves the utmost secrecy. The love shared must be kept secret less the
ladys honor (who the knight has sworn to uphold and dutybound to protect)
becomes blemished. As seen throughout the entire epic poem, Troilus duly
qualifies every last tenet of courtly love. We see him smirk at those in love
before he is struck by Cupids arrow. At the very sight of Criseyde, Chaucer
writes “And of hire look in hem ther gan to quken/So gret desir and such
affeccioun,/That in his hertes botme gan to stiken/Of hir his fixe and depe
impressioun” (14). After Troilus has been struck by Cupids arrow,
“he continues to mock all lovers in order to maintain secrecy about his
love (Berkley Research 8). Finally upon revealing his secret to Pandarus,
Troilus dedicates himself to serve Criseyde and the god of love. “And to
the God of Love thus seyde he/With pitous vois, “O lord, now youres be./Yow
thanke I, lord, that han me brought to this./But whether goodesse or womman,
iwis,/She be, I not, which that ye do me serve;/But as hire man I wol ay lyve
and sterve” (Chaucer 19). He proves himself worthy of his ladys love by
accomplishing great deeds in the battle against the Greeks. “At the same
time, Troilus is very gentle and tender about town, illustrating the supposed
ennobling qualities of loveIn a like manner, he hunts dangerous beasts,
but lets the smaller one escape, thus showing his bravery and his
tenderheartedness” (Berkley Research 9). Beyond these acts, Troilus
demonstrates the various characteristics of the courtly love by swooning at his
ladys disapproval, becoming highly agitated and distressed over his ladys
absence. He is tormented by having to keep his love a secret, but is duty bound
to uphold the secrecy. In effect, he is torn between his souls desire and his
hearts desire. In addition to all of this, Troilus seems to be quite passive.

He follows along with the deceits of Pandarus, despite the fact it only serves
to dishonor Criseyde. When Criseyde is named for the exchange, Troilus fears
that any action on his part will result in the death of his lady love.

Furthermore, Troilus never doubts that Criseyde will remain faithful to him.

Even at the moment of realized betrayal, Troilus treats his lady with respect as
he still loves her. He states “Thorugh which I se that clene out of youre
mynde/Ye han me cast; and I ne kan nor may,/For al this world, withinne myn
herte fynde/To unloven yow a quarter of a day!/In corsed tyme I born was,
weilaway,/That yow, that doon me al this wo endure,/Yet love I best of any
creature!” (Chaucer 305). By claiming this, Troilus proves he is the
epitome of courtly love, by holding a love that cannot be banished by the
betrayal of Criseyde, which makes it an everlasting love. Thus the character of
Troilus can be defined as ideal, virtuous, and noble in his love Criseyde,
making him the soul of tenderness. However at the same time, by exemplifying the
hero, Chaucer shows how ridiculous and pathetic the courtly lover is, especially
at his most romantic moment. In contrast to Troilus, Criseyde plays the part of
the courtly lady, but Chaucer makes her a more humanly figure. Because of her
realistic qualities, Gordon argues that the real tragedy belonged to Criseyde.

She states “To have developed the latent tragedy of her situation, her
brightness and beauty dwindling as soon as she leaves Troy, her moment of
self-realization in the presence of the crude Diomed, when she acknowledges her
weakness, her feeble effort to recover as she slides backward, would have made a
different poem” (157). Gordon also claims that Criseydes treachery
was a direct result of her fathers traitorous actions and her uncles
dishonorable actions. When Criseyde is first introduced, she is dressed in
widows garb, mourning. She has all the honorable intentions that get pushed
aside with Pandarus help. However, upon her first speech with Pandarus,
readers gather a rather conflicting opinions of Criseyde. Despite her explicable
anger over Pandarus proposition, Criseyde fears for Troilus life,
believing he will actually commit suicide over her. Her fear leads her to agree
to Pandarus deceit, making readers interpret her actions as flirting. Chaucer
seems to support this by portraying Criseyde as a timid person: “Criseyde,
which that wel neigh starf for feere,/So as she was the ferfulleste wight/That
myghte be, and herde ek with hire ere/And saugh the sorwful ernest of the knyght,/And
for the harm that myghte ek fallen moore,/She gan to rewe, and dredde hire
wonder soore,” (Chaucer 63). According to Gordon, Criseydes unease over
the proposition demonstrates her worldly understanding. She argues that nature
of “switch love” is the central moral question of the poem, and that
question that Criseyde continually deals with (Gordon 157). Furthermore,
Criseyde must consider the question of honor as she is at court and gossip is a
lethal weapon. Her concern here demonstrates the practical side of Criseyde. Her
rational side is shown by her consideration of Troilus suit. She weighs the
facts that he is a son of a king, a great warrior, and deemed a good man by
most. She neatly traps Troilus beneath her by allowing him to serve her only
under one condition: he has no other sovereign except for herself. Her
intelligence is only emphasized by her capitulation to Troilus. When he asks her
to yield, she responds that if she had not yielded already, she would not be in
the room. Furthermore, she did not appear surprised when Troilus showed up in
her chambers. All these qualities represent the humanity that Chaucer has
endowed Criseyde with. Despite the realistic qualities Chaucer endows Criseyde
with, he fulfills her role as the lady love. She does not question the authority
of men or fate, as demonstrated by her reaction to the news of her exchange.

Furthermore, she believes that she cannot be disconnected from Troilus as her
love for him binds her to him for all time. She upholds the tenant of secrecy
even when people assume she is crying from joy as they congratulate her on the
exchange. Criseyde even goes so far as to contemplate a slow painful death by
starvation in order to stay loyal to Troilus. With her great sorrow due to her
departure from Troilus, Criseyde remains blind to Diomede. Her sorrow is doubled
when she fails to convince her father to return her to Troy. This is where the
tragedy of Criseyde begins, according to Gordon. Criseyde tragedy is
self-deception. She never realized she was capable of betrayal until she
actually committed the act (Gordon 137). It is noted that when Criseyde is
listing all the reasons for her love to Troilus, she lists more of his manners
than his character. Furthermore, it is noted that in the first part of the epic
poem, only Criseydes looks and demeanor are commented upon, whereas in the
second part of the poem, the reader gets a more concise view of Criseydes
character (Gordon 137). It is not until Book V, that Chaucer refers to Criseyde
as the “slydynge of corage” (272). With her acceptance of Diomede,
Criseyde breaks the code of courtly love, marking her as weak and perhaps a bit
of an opportunist. In fact one can argue that Criseydes choice of Diomede was
one of practicality rather than of romance (Berkley Research 17). However,
Chaucer defends Criseyde by claiming: “Ne me ne list this sely womman chyde/Forther
than the storye wol devyse./Hire name, allas! is punysshed so wide,/That for
hire gilt it oughte ynough suffise./And if I myghte excuse hire any wise,/For
she so sory was for hire untroughte,/Iwis, I wolde excuse hire yet for routhe”
(282). Criseydes fall from grace is the ultimate mark of humanity that
separates her from the stereotypical ideal of the courtly lady. She recognizes
she has committed a wrong, even thought she believes she can never atone for it.

The very fact that she does break a tenant of courtly love demonstrates
Chaucers willingness to create characters that delve outside the stereotype
world. It becomes obvious that Chaucer has given great thought and imagination
to carefully depict his three characters to help evolve his plot and give a
human interest perspective to an otherwise old story. His use of contrast is
spectacularly essential. He shows Troilus to be the very typical courtly lover.

Whatever derivations Troilus develops only emphasizes his uniqueness as a figure
of Chaucer. In contrast to the innocence of Troilus love, Pandarus is
portrayed as old and extremely shrew. He knows how to weasel even the most
treasured secrets from a body and manipulate that to further his own interests.

Pandarus is arguably one of the most original and imaginative character of
Chaucer. While not as original as Pandarus, Criseyde represents the ideal
courtly lady with a realistic twist. She sharply contrasts with Troilus with her
rationality and even her practicality. She measures every action first, while
Troilus just follows whatever way will lead him to his perceived goal. All
combined, Chaucer manages to create an ideal constantly embued with originality
that invokes the readers continual interest in the epic poem, Troilus and
Criseyde.


Bibliography
Baum, Paul E. Chaucer: A Critical Appreciation. Durham, North Carolina: Duke
University Press, 1958. Berkeley Research. The Development of Character in
Troilus and Criseyde. Proprietary document. San Francisco, California: Berkeley
Research, 1997. Chaucer, Geoffrey. Troilus and Criseyde. Edited by R. A. Shoaf.

East Lansing, Michigan: Colleagues Press, 1989. Gordon, Ida. The Double Sorrow
of Troilus. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1970. Kirby, Thomas A. Chaucers
Troilus: A Study in Courtly Love. Gloucester, Massachusetts: Peter Smith, 1958.

Lewis, C. S. The Allegory of Love. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1936.

Rosetti, W. M. Chaucers Troylus and Cryseyde Compared with Boccaccios
Filostrato. London: Oxford University Press, 1875.


English Essays

close

HAVEN’T FOUND ESSAY YOU WANT?

Get your custom essay sample

FOR ONLY $13.90/PAGE

Nora
Tucker

Hi there, would you like to get such a paper? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out